Last one!!

So I’ve finally finished writing everything. It was a lot of information to compile and put all together and write it all up. I didn’t have the time to talk to as many people as I would have liked (and still upset about not being able to go to Quai 9) but I still learned enough to know this is a subject I’d like to spend more time on. I’ve always been interested in HIV/AIDS topics but looking at it from the intravenous drug perspective has been new for me. Talking to Annette Verster and reading about what it’s like to work with drug users from an HIV prevention view has been really interesting and I’d like to look more into it.

If nothing else, I’ve found another possible career path I could be interested in. To be added to the long list…

The Future of Television Programming: Only Sorta on TV

What I was most surprised by in my research was how much did not surprise me. As much as there have been shows in the past that were canceled despite being great and having a decent amount of devoted fans and other shows that survived for a while despite general disinterest, I understand what happened to most of these shows. Some failed to do what people expected or wanted, and others faced stiff competition and had awful lead-ins.
The exceptions were the main point of my research. Shows that were canceled prematurely, at least in my opinion, included Running Wilde, My Generation, Detroit 1-8-7, and maybe also The Event. Although I understand why these shows did not get better ratings when they aired, I think they showed potential for a pickup in ratings in a year or two. Making these shows very available online and advertising on sites like hulu.com could generate interest. Making them available on Netflix Instant Watch as soon as possible allows people to catch up on their own and then go ahead and watch current episodes on air. Also, the current ratings system is way, way off. Relying on overnight numbers rather than comprehensively counting the number of times people watch (and re-watch) online counts out millions of viewers. Most importantly, these numbers are skewed toward different groups of people and consequently different types of television. While procedural dramas with a gimmick can amuse casual audiences late in the evening, they do not register high numbers online. They also are less likely to make money years later on DVD, Netflix, iTunes, or other ways of catching up on seasons of television at a time. Meanwhile, situational comedies and character dramas can engross audiences for seasons at a time, but their availability online makes internet-savvy groups more willing to miss a few episodes and catch up later. Younger groups, such as high schoolers, college students, and parents with busy schedules, are wildly underrepresented in ratings. Networks are less likely to continue making money off those that prefer procedural dramas or older generations that aren’t exactly tech-savvy, but these weigh heavily in overnight ratings that matter in deciding if a show will be canceled or not.
Of course, a lot of information that I was unable to research goes into these decisions. I would love to have found a way to quantify the effort networks put into advertising different shows relative to one another. Also, with respect to my limited time and the amount of material for just four channels, I was not able to consider cable television’s role. Some cable networks will pick up a canceled broadcast network’s show, like what happened to Law & Order: Criminal Intent. Cable networks seem to have a better idea of how to develop a show during several seasons and make material available online for viewers to discover and fall in love with. Critics generally favor cable shows that can take more risks, because they are technically not broadcast to the general public, and shows such as True Blood, Dexter, and Mad Men have enjoyed ever-increasing ratings as well as critical acclaim.
The main conclusion I have drawn from my research is that the four broadcast networks need to consider the potential for future success just as much or more than its current overnight ratings when they decide if it will survive its first season or make it to a second season. This will split television further into two types of television: shows that pass time, and shows that develop characters, story lines, and fan bases over several years.

So close!

So remember how I was hoping to visit Geneva’s injection site? That never happened. Annette Verster unfortunately never got back to me, even though I emailed her twice after the interview. Instead I had to satisfy myself with just looking at Quai 9 while on the tram that would drive past it everyday, checking the surroundings hoping for a glimpse of something interesting. Even then, the most activity I saw was a group of men smoking outside of what I’m assuming was the bar section of the injection site. But then, the fact that there was not much activity outside of the facility to report is a sign that it’s doing it’s job and not disturbing the surrounding area.

To make up for my lack of being able to actually go to the site and talk to people who work there, I did a very intense literature search and managed to find an evaluation done of the site in 2003. The project was opened in 2001, so this was in its early days. A group at the University of Lausanne, in the social and preventive medicine department, did the evaluation and came up with some already quite positive results within that first year. The neighborhood that Quai 9 is situated in, known as Les Grottes (or The Caves in English), was one of the areas most affected by Geneva’s drug problem. It was quite common to find dirty needles in playgrounds, apartment building hallways and stairwells, and in alleys. There was also a problem with users being aggressive towards the people who lived there. There was certainly a safety concern and in the evaluation a lot of the people in the neighborhood were interviewed and viewed the project favorably, hoping it would improve the situation.

I walk through that neighborhood quite often myself, and I never feel worried when in the vicinity of Quai 9. They are definitely serious about their “no violence in the immediate area” rule, and there’s a cooperation with the police to reinforce that rule if needed. I still wish I had been able to visit Quai 9 but oh well. I’ll just try again on my own time.