Conclusions.

Dear reader,

As of the end of this summer, my results are inconclusive. Some tantalizing data (pictured below) suggests small larvae may clone at a higher rate, perhaps to overcome the increased

Small larvae appear to consistently clone at higher rates.

mortality suffered by the smaller, weaker larvae. However, though these data look exciting, we do not have enough confidence to back them up. It is clearly something that has potential though, hence my desires for next summer.

There is also an interesting wave of cloning with time. It appears the larvae go through phases of high cloning rates then we see a lull then back to a new phase of cloning. The small and large treatments seem to follow this pattern. The issue came with the density measurements. First, we saw a general decrease in density which is contrary to what would be expected if the larvae were cloning. Second, the initial protocol did not allow for precise enough measurements.

A. forbesi spawning.

All in all, I will be excited come sea star spawning season.

 

 

 

(photo credit: J. Allen)

I love dissecting scopes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks,

Holly Blackburn.

Farewell.

Dear reader,

The last few weeks in Maine ended up being more work than I had imagined, however, I surely learned more about true research in those three weeks than my college career thus far. Things didn’t end up quite how I would have wanted. I am missing some vital data points and the experimental design needed some tweaking. So, the unfortunate news is that things didn’t work out well. However, as I have heard all too often, “that’s science,” and who doesn’t love it?!   So science is eight hundred failures and one success? Wouldn’t have it any other way.

So, the next step is to just start over. The new design (pictured below) will have more replicates and fewer larvae in an attempt to keep exact density counts.

Experimental design.

Today, we tried a last futile attempt at spawning some leftover sea stars, had some minor success, then development went awry. The sea stars have made their decision; the experiment is over.

 

However, this is still an awesome project just waiting to be explored. So stay tuned readers, next summer I will start over, sing to the sea stars a little, and get those vital data!

 

 

I would also like to thank everyone that helped me this summer. First of all, thank you to the Charles Center for funding!

My everyday schedule.

Thanks to Dr. Jon Allen for convincing me to go to Maine; the research experience was better than I would have ever predicted. Thanks to Bowdoin for housing and the great marine lab. Thanks to Drs. Amy and Olaf Johnson, Dr. Rivers and all the fellows in Maine for a great summer (pictured right).

Thanks also to my labmates, Jordan Salyers, Daniel Schwab, and Kelly Hoolihan.

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks.

Sincerely,

Holly Blackburn.

Episode two: attack of the clones.

Hello again,

Rockland breakwater

So, the sand dollars and I had a falling out. Their offspring don’t much like me lately. Apparently, developing after being ripped in half three times is too stressful. I’m hoping that when I return to Williamsburg we can rekindle our love. But for right now I’m on the rebound with some nice sea stars, specifically, Asterias forbesi. We met at Rockland breakwater and we hit it off pretty quickly. As you can see in the picture (right), he was pretty attached to me right from the beginning.

Interspecies love

Don’t worry though, the sand dollars and the sea stars are still cool with each other; there are no hard feelings (pictured left).
So basically, I ditched the sand dollars and picked up sea stars for the time being. My

Variable egg size

new project looks at cloning rates in these sea stars. A. forbesi can have extremely variable egg sizes. So within the same clutch of a single female there can be small eggs that are half the volume of another (pictured right).  What we want to see is if this initial volume has any affect on cloning rates. It would be easy to assume that the larger eggs would clone more frequently because they have more energy that they can donate to clones.

Stirring rack

However, sea stars have planktotrophic larvae meaning they feed, so perhaps the small eggs could get their energy elsewhere and clone at just as high of rates.  So we spawned the sea stars, fertilized the eggs. Then we separated out 100 large eggs or 100 small eggs each into 12 beakers. We set up a

Rockland breakwater also

stirring rack (pictured left with guest appearance by Jordan Salyers) to keep them happy, though it does not keep me happy since it breaks down frequently. Lastly, we named all 1200 of  them Fabio (Thanks to the contribution of Gina Lonati, picture right most).

 

Yesterday, finally after days of searching, I found a semi awesome picture of cloning, or the result of cloning at least. It is was the top and bottom half of a head clone.
Pictured left is generally what a normal larva would look like (he probably cloned off one of his arms at the bottom, but his general anatomy is pretty normal). Pictured right are the guys I found yesterday. So here, Fabio (who now looks like a roasted chicken breast) has cloned off his head to form another Fabio. So the trunk still has an esophagus and stomach, but the head only has a mouth. They should both develop everything they need. I hope to take some more pictures of them in the coming week to see how they start regenerating everything.

 

More importantly though, I had a rowboating race (pictured left) against Jon Allen. I lost miserably, but now I know how to row a boat to an island and back.
Shout out to Ben Chalfin for reminding me to blog.
And also, shout out to Yoda for finding the time to make an appearance in my beaker of larvae.

Larval yoda

To be continued.. by Holly Blackburn